AgileDigest
AgileDigest
On-premise · Air-gapped · Fully sovereign

Private & DisconnectedLLM Engineering

Enterprise-grade AI that runs entirely on your hardware — no cloud, no per-token bills, no data ever leaving your perimeter. Architected, fine-tuned, quantized, and delivered as a complete product: model, API, and UI.

From a single Ollama instance on a workstation to multi-model GPU clusters — we design the smallest infrastructure that delivers the quality your business needs.
Explore Hardware & Model Options

Zero data egress

Prompts, documents, and outputs never touch a third-party cloud

Flat, predictable cost

Own the hardware; retire the per-token meter

Open-weight freedom

Mistral, Gemma, Llama, Qwen, Phi & more — no vendor lock-in

Right-sized infra

Quantization engineered across the full Q4→Q8→FP16 spectrum for your quality bar

MistralGemmaLlamaQwenPhiGPT-OSSOllamaLM StudiovLLMllama.cppGGUFLoRA / QLoRACUDANVIDIA DGX SparkRTX PRO 6000MistralGemmaLlamaQwenPhiGPT-OSSOllamaLM StudiovLLMllama.cppGGUFLoRA / QLoRACUDANVIDIA DGX SparkRTX PRO 6000

01 — The problem

When the Cloud Is the Wrong Answer

Cloud LLM APIs are remarkable — until they collide with your reality:

Your data can’t leave.

Patient records, legal case files, financial models, defense specifications, unreleased IP. For many organizations, sending this to an external API isn’t a risk calculation — it’s a regulatory or contractual impossibility.

The meter never stops.

Per-token pricing that looked trivial in the pilot becomes a six-figure line item at production scale. Costs grow with your success.

You don’t control the stack.

Model deprecations, rate limits, policy changes, outages, and price revisions all happen on someone else’s schedule.

Connectivity isn’t guaranteed.

Factory floors, ships, field operations, secure facilities — plenty of real work happens where reliable internet doesn’t.

The obvious answer — “just run a model locally” — hides the hard part. Downloading a model is a command. Making it production-grade requires model selection, fine-tuning, quantization strategy, memory engineering, serving architecture, API design, application integration, and hardware that matches the workload. Get any layer wrong and you end up with a system that's too slow, too expensive, or too dumb.

Running a local model is easy. Running the right model, at the right quantization, on the right hardware, wired into your actual applications — that's engineering.

02 — The solution

The Complete Private LLM Stack — Delivered as One Solution

We don't hand you a model and a manual. We deliver a working AI product on your infrastructure, engineered layer by layer:

Your infrastructure — nothing leaves
1

Application & UI Layer

Custom chat interfaces, document workbenches, and dashboards your teams actually use

2

API Layer

OpenAI-compatible REST APIs, so your existing apps and tools connect without rewrites

3

Intelligence Layer

Fine-tuned open-weight models (Mistral, Gemma, Llama, Qwen, Phi) + RAG over your documents

4

Serving Layer

Ollama, LM Studio, vLLM, or llama.cpp — chosen for your concurrency, latency, and ops profile

5

Optimization Layer

Quantization (GGUF Q4/Q5/Q8), KV-cache tuning, context management, GPU offload strategy

6

Hardware Layer

From NVIDIA DGX Spark desktops to RTX PRO 6000 workstations to multi-GPU servers

One constraint

Maximum output quality on minimum infrastructure.

Every layer is engineered against one constraint: maximum output quality on minimum infrastructure. That trade-off is our specialty.

03 — Capabilities

What We Build

1

Model Strategy & Architecture

The right model beats the biggest model.

We benchmark candidate open-weight models — Mistral, Gemma, Llama, Qwen, Phi, GPT-OSS and beyond — against your tasks, not leaderboards. A well-chosen 8B model with RAG often outperforms a struggling 70B on domain work, at a tenth of the hardware cost. You get a documented model selection with measured accuracy, latency, and memory numbers.

2

Business-Specific Fine-Tuning

Your terminology, your formats, your judgment — baked into the weights.

LoRA and QLoRA fine-tuning on your data (contracts, tickets, reports, transcripts), executed entirely inside your environment so training data never leaves. Instruction tuning for your workflows, output-format enforcement, and evaluation suites that prove the tuned model beats the base model on your metrics before it ships.

Our differentiator3

Quantization & Memory Engineering

The art of fitting more intelligence into less silicon.

Quantization decisions make or break local deployments — and there is no universal right answer, only a spectrum. From aggressive Q4-class quantization (smallest footprint, highest artifact risk) through the Q5/Q6 midrange to Q8 and full FP16 precision, every step trades memory and speed against fidelity. We run your actual workload across that spectrum and measure where quality genuinely degrades for your tasks, not in theory. Some workloads sail at Q4; others demand Q8; most land somewhere in between — and the difference can mean one GPU instead of two, or a desktop instead of a server. We also engineer KV-cache quantization, context-window sizing, layer offloading, and batch strategy — squeezing every gigabyte of VRAM.

4

End-to-End Product Engineering (APIs + UI)

A model without an application is a science project.

OpenAI-compatible API endpoints so anything built for GPT works against your private model unchanged. Custom UIs — secure chat interfaces, document Q&A workbenches, review dashboards — plus integration into your existing systems (ERP, CRM, ticketing, SharePoint, databases) with role-based access control and full audit logging.

5

Multimodal & Analysis Pipelines

Beyond chat: your files, footage, and feedback — processed on-prem.

CUDA-accelerated pipelines for video processing and frame/scene extraction, image extraction and OCR, document parsing, and speech-to-text. Downstream analysis engines: sentiment analysis on reviews and support tickets, entity extraction, classification, and summarization — all running on the same private hardware, no external API calls.

6

Hardware Architecture & Blocker Resolution

We unstick the deployments others abandoned.

Hardware selection and build-out — NVIDIA DGX Spark, RTX PRO 6000 workstations, multi-GPU servers, or optimization of hardware you already own. And when deployments stall — CUDA/driver conflicts, OOM crashes, thermal throttling, models that load but crawl, quantization artifacts corrupting outputs — we diagnose and resolve. Many clients come to us mid-failure; rescue engagements are a specialty.

04 — Topologies

One Model or Many? Shared or Isolated? We Architect for Your Reality.

There's no universal topology. The right answer depends on workloads, teams, compliance boundaries, and budget. Common patterns we deploy:

A

Single Model, Single Instance

1 model

One capable general model serving the whole organization via one endpoint. Simplest ops, lowest cost.

Fits: small teams, unified use case, first deployment.

B

Multi-Model, Single Machine

one machine · memory budget

Several specialized models (a coder, a summarizer, an extraction model) co-resident on one high-memory machine — e.g., a 128GB DGX Spark — hot-swapped or served in parallel with engineered memory budgets per model.

Fits: diverse workloads, constrained hardware budget.

C

Isolated Instances per Department / Client

Separate model instances with hard resource and data isolation — finance’s model never sees legal’s documents. Essential for internal compliance walls or agencies serving multiple end-clients.

Fits: multi-tenant needs, strict data segregation.

D

Clustered / High-Concurrency Serving

vLLM-class serving with continuous batching across multiple GPUs for hundreds of concurrent users with latency SLAs.

Fits: org-wide rollouts, customer-facing products.

05 — Hardware

Right-Sized Hardware, From Desk to Data Center

We spec hardware to the workload — never the other way around. Representative tiers:

Desk AI

NVIDIA DGX Spark (GB10)

Memory

128GB unified

Sweet spot

Models up to ~120–200B (quantized); prototyping to small-team production

Investment

~$4–5K

Workstation

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell workstation

Memory

96GB VRAM

Sweet spot

Fast 30–70B serving, fine-tuning, multimodal pipelines

Investment

~$10–15K

Server

Multi-GPU rack (2–4× pro GPUs)

Memory

192GB+ VRAM

Sweet spot

High concurrency, multiple isolated models, latency SLAs

Investment

~$30K+

Existing fleet

Your current GPUs/workstations

Memory

varies

Sweet spot

Quantization + offload engineering to unlock hardware you already own

Investment

$0 hardware

Often the cheapest upgrade isn't hardware at all — it's a smarter quantization and serving strategy on the machines you already have. We check that first.

06 — The trade-off

The Quantization Spectrum — Where Engineering Meets Economics

Every local LLM deployment lives on a three-way trade-off: output quality ↔ memory footprint ↔ speed. Quantization is the lever that moves all three — and it's a spectrum, not a setting.

At one end, full-precision and Q8-class formats preserve near-complete fidelity but demand maximum memory. At the other, aggressive Q4-class quantization fits the same model in roughly half the space — but on demanding tasks, compression artifacts can appear: degraded reasoning chains, format drift, subtle factual slips. Between them lies a ladder of intermediate levels, each with its own quality/footprint profile. There is no universally correct point on this spectrum. A code-generation workload, a legal summarizer, and a customer-sentiment classifier will each tolerate compression differently — sometimes on the very same model.

The professional question isn't “which quantization is best?” — it's “where on the spectrum does your workload stop noticing the difference?” That's an empirical question, and we answer it empirically: we run your representative tasks across the full quantization ladder, score outputs against your quality bar, and select the lowest-footprint level that passes. The result is a documented, defensible configuration — not a guess and not a default.

Quality ↔ memory ↔ speed

Output qualityMemory footprint
aggressive Q4midrangeQ8 → FP16

e.g. classification workload — tolerates heavier compression

e.g. complex reasoning workload — demands higher precision

Your workload sets this point — we find it by benchmark, not by default.

Illustrative outcome

Document summarization workloadbenchmarked Q4 → Q8reviewers can’t distinguish midrange from Q8midrange selected

~⅓

memory footprint cut

1 GPU

single RTX PRO 6000 instead of a dual-GPU server

5-figure

hardware savings, zero measured quality loss

A different workload on the same model might have demanded Q8 — that's precisely why we benchmark instead of defaulting.

07 — Economics & pipelines

Own the Hardware. Retire the Meter.

Cumulative cost · 24 months

Cloud APIPrivate deployment
month 024

Typical break-even — after which the meter stays off

+ your data never left the building

Illustrative shape only — the crossover point depends on your usage volume, model size, and hardware tier. We model it against your real numbers in Phase 01.

Same private perimeter
Video
Images
Documents
Audio
Reviews

CUDA-accelerated processing

extraction · OCR · transcription

Sentiment scores
Entities
Summaries
Searchable index

08 — Rescue

Already Tried and Hit a Wall? We Unstick Deployments.

Many clients come to us mid-failure. Typical culprits: wrong quantization for the task, VRAM overflow into system RAM, missing CUDA optimization, misconfigured context windows, or a model mismatched to the job. We diagnose, fix, and document — often on your existing hardware.

before

$ ollama run mistral-large

CUDA error: out of memory

tried to allocate 18.2 GiB

process killed (OOM)

diagnosis
  • Quantization mismatched to task
  • VRAM overflow into system RAM
  • Missing CUDA optimization
  • Context window misconfigured
after
throughputtokens/sec ▲
VRAM headroomstable

Often on the client's existing hardware.

09 — Framework

From Feasibility to Production in 5 Phases

PHASE 01Week 1

Feasibility & Workload Analysis

Use cases, data sensitivity, quality bar, concurrency, and budget. Honest answer up front: is private LLM the right architecture for you? (Sometimes it isn’t — we’ll say so.)

You get: feasibility report + recommended model/hardware shortlist.

PHASE 02Week 1–3

Model Selection & Benchmarking

Candidate models benchmarked on your tasks across quantization levels. Accuracy, latency, and memory measured, not assumed.

You get: benchmark matrix + selected model & quantization config.

PHASE 03Week 3–6

Fine-Tuning & Pipeline Build

LoRA/QLoRA tuning on your data, RAG construction over your documents, multimodal pipelines (video/image/sentiment) as required.

You get: a tuned model that beats baseline on your eval suite.

PHASE 04Week 5–8

Integration & Product Delivery

API layer, UI, application integrations, access control, audit logging, and deployment on production hardware with monitoring.

You get: a live system your team uses daily.

PHASE 05Ongoing

Optimization, Handoff & Support

Memory and throughput tuning under real load, admin training, runbooks, and optional managed support / model-refresh cycles as better open models release.

You get: an internally owned system with a clear upgrade path.

10 — Use cases

Where Private LLMs Earn Their Keep

Healthcare & Legal

Patient-record and case-file analysis where data provably never leaves premises; on-prem document Q&A with citation.

Financial Services

Research summarization, contract intelligence, and sentiment analysis on proprietary data behind the firewall.

Manufacturing & Field Operations

Offline-capable assistants and video/image inspection pipelines on the factory floor — no connectivity required.

Government & Defense

Air-gapped deployments in classified or restricted environments with full audit trails.

Agencies & ISVs

Per-client isolated model instances — sell AI capability without routing client data through third-party APIs.

11 — Questions

Frequently Asked Questions

For focused business tasks — document analysis, drafting, extraction, support, code assistance — modern open-weight models, properly selected and fine-tuned on your domain, routinely deliver production-grade results. The 2024 quality gap has narrowed dramatically. We prove fitness with benchmarks on your tasks before you commit to hardware.

12 — Get started

Your Data. Your Hardware. Your AI.

Find out — concretely — what a private LLM deployment would look like for your organization: recommended model, quantization strategy, hardware tier, and budget range. A no-cost feasibility assessment with a senior engineer, not a sales call.

Contact Engineering Support
[email protected]+1 (917) 524-0676+91 88008 42559

Get Your Private LLM Feasibility Assessment

Tell us your primary driver — data privacy, cloud API costs, offline needs, or rescuing a stalled deployment — and a senior engineer will map the options.